How exceptionally interesting, as I didn't mail youtube... Headers of what I did send:
From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckin...@gmail.com> X-KMail-Identity: 1726407999 X-KMail-Transport: Gmail X-KMail-Fcc: .Community.directory/gentoo-user To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Kernel Modules Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 21:37:30 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.39-ck; KDE/4.6.3; x86_64; ; ) References: <4df0a5fa.1020...@gmail.com> <201106092018.37311.alan.mckin...@gmail.com> <4df118fc.2030...@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4df118fc.2030...@gmail.com> X-KMail-Link-Message: 96095 X-KMail-Link-Type: reply X-KMail-QuotePrefix: > MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201106092137.30415.alan.mckin...@gmail.com> Status: RO X-Status: RS X-KMail-EncryptionState: N X-KMail-SignatureState: N X-KMail-MDN-Sent: I wonder if this one will do the same. Apparently, though unproven, at 21:44 on Thursday 09 June 2011, YouTube Support did opine thusly: > You are receiving this automated reply because you have sent mail to > an invalid email address. If you are trying to contact YouTube, > please visit the YouTube Help Center at: > http://www.google.com/support/youtube > > If you're unable to find the answer to your question in the Help > Center, you may use the contact forms located there to send us your > question. > > > > Original Message Follows: > ------------------------ > From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckin...@gmail.com> > Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Kernel Modules > Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 21:37:30 +0200 > > Apparently, though unproven, at 21:03 on Thursday 09 June 2011, Dale did > opine > > thusly: > > Alan McKinnon wrote: > > > Sure, but I can use ln in my sleep. > > > > > > eselect OTOH, is something I always have to run bit by bit to recall > > the > > > > invocation. That's just way too much effort for this here old git.... > > > > I'm still not used to eselect and its options. They are sensible but I > > just haven't got the hang of it. I been practicing tho. I do eselect > > modules list then go from there. You are right tho Alan, in the end, it > > takes longer. I bet it was supposed to save time too. lol > > On the whole, eselect is a good idea, just some of it's modules are > extreme. > > eselect opengl and eselect python are just two examples of things I have > no > idea how to accomplish manually -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
