On 26/04/2013 10:50, Mark David Dumlao wrote: >> "It does no harm and might be useful for some" is simply not a valid >> > reason to enforce a package on all users, especially when said package >> > is the latest johnny-come-lately from a wunderkind with a proven >> > reputation for writing invasive code[1] > Oh dear. I should've realized what this was really about. There aren't > really any technical reasons behind this, are there? Just some good > old fashioned Lennart hate boners. > > I have a perfect halloween campfire story for this group. The one > where a malicious udev update gives a backdoor for He Who Must Not Be > Named to install his LennartWare onto yor systems...
You missed the mark completely and your bias appears to be showing. You have no idea what I might consider this to be "really about". And it's highly presumptuous of you to make the assumption you did. -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
