Neil Bothwick <neil <at> digimed.co.uk> writes:
> > Today, I have many many ugly and hacked java projects > > on my "munge" system. I have spend countless hours hacking > > at java; so I do not wish for any dev-java codes to be removed > > by --depclean, but the others can be cleaned up. > Why not simply create a set containing all the ebuilds you are > experimenting with? I'm not sure how to put everything dev-java into a set; so that it will updated but not depclean out those packages. Gotta quick example? It's been a while since I used sets in portage.... James
