On Saturday 14 Mar 2015 23:03:26 James wrote: > Neil Bothwick <neil <at> digimed.co.uk> writes: > > > Today, I have many many ugly and hacked java projects > > > on my "munge" system. I have spend countless hours hacking > > > at java; so I do not wish for any dev-java codes to be removed > > > by --depclean, but the others can be cleaned up. > > > > Why not simply create a set containing all the ebuilds you are > > experimenting with? > > I'm not sure how to put everything dev-java into a set; so that > it will updated but not depclean out those packages. > > Gotta quick example? It's been a while since I used sets in portage.... > > > James
I don't use java, but assuming you know what packages you want to define separately for your java needs, have a look here for syntax: http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki//etc/portage/sets -- Regards, Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
