Am Mon, 21 Dec 2015 22:37:38 +0000 schrieb Mick <michaelkintz...@gmail.com>:
> On Monday 21 Dec 2015 21:43:00 Kai Krakow wrote: > > Am Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:25:34 -0500 > > > > schrieb waltd...@waltdnes.org: > > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 02:06:25PM +0000, James wrote > > > > > > > From what I read/understand openrc is in the process of removal > > > > from @system, for all profiles? > > > > > > > In Lennart's dreams... and many peoples' nightmares. > > > > Haters gonna hate... > > > > If I look at the virtual/service-manager ebuild, openrc probably in > > the process of being removed from the system set and replaced by > > this virtual. In that way you can more easily replace openrc with a > > service manager of your choice. > > > > The upgrade path will be straight forward: It doesn't affect your > > openrc installation at all because through the service-manager deps > > openrc is still pulled into the system set - simply by the fact > > that it is installed. > > Nevertheless, virtual options to make it easier to use alternatives > to the current stable version of openrc are not my problem at this > stage. I can't get ifplugd to work, unless I start up net.<iface> > first and I am getting no /var/log/rc.log to see what's gone > sideways. Regardless of these problems I am getting warnings on the > console during boot time as posted initially. Apparently I cannot help here because I removed openrc from my system months ago (even install masking /etc/init.d) but I still maintain systems which run openrc (and, *cough* baselayout-1, you didn't read that, did you?). Upgrade paths there almost always involved following "eselect news read new", the hardest ones involved network and device management services. It's kind of a challenge to do this on a headless, remote system without needing to physically access the machine. [1] > Am I alone in experiencing this? Any ideas for fixing it? Should I > post a bug and if so where? I'm thinking that asking Lennart to fix > ifplugd so that it works with openrc would be taking it a step too > far. :p Hehe... Hey, this is surprisingly amusing. May I quote that? :-D Thanks for the smirk. [1]: Ah well, I cheated a bit: It's virtualized so I had another channel of console access. ;-) -- Regards, Kai Replies to list-only preferred.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
