On Sunday 03 January 2016 11:08:32 I wrote:
> On Saturday 02 January 2016 12:45:09 Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 01:23:28PM +0000, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > > > > you see here. And the qt5 screen shot is half as big again as the
> > > > > qt4.
> > > > 
> > > > I don't quite get that.
> > > 
> > > ??
> > 
> > Both images are the same size. The usable content area in the qt5
> > screenshot is far from just half. Maybe the word “again” tips me off b/c
> > I try to interpret a meaning into every word, being a pedantic
> > non-native. ;-)
> 
> I meant the size of the file.

And now I want to add that using 1.5 x the space to represent far less 
information is a clear indicator of inefficiency.

-- 
Rgds
Peter


Reply via email to