On Sunday 03 January 2016 14:49:10 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 11:44:37 +0000, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > > I meant the size of the file. > > > > And now I want to add that using 1.5 x the space to represent far less > > information is a clear indicator of inefficiency. > > Efficiency is not everything, readability is often more important.
Yes, of course I know that, and the readability I've developed with KMail-2 in KDE-4 suits me nicely. I don't see any of the busyness that QT-5 advocates decry, but I do see swathes of wasted space in the same program in KDE-5. And I do mean *wasted* - it achieves nothing at all on a desktop screen and would be better used for something. Maybe the nice people at kde.org will let us have a better theme for desktops in due course. -- Rgds Peter
