So, I restored all the files, I could like sendmail.mc and the Sendmail.conf, but no joy, still no authentication mechanisms. I restored them to about first of April. This still leads me to saslauthd.
On Thu, 05 May 2022 12:52:45 -0400, Grant Taylor wrote: > > On 5/5/22 10:39 AM, John Covici wrote: > > saslauthd is running, but it seems to ignore the Sendmail.conf . > > I think it's the other way around. > > Sendmail is told to support authentication via one or more > methods, one of which can be SASL and co. > > The actual SASL auth daemon just listens on a unix socket and / > or TCP port for clients to test authentication pairs, returning a > pass fail type message. > > > I used openssl s_client to connect to my sendmail, it was happy > > with the certs, but in response to the ehlo gives me no auth > > line at all. > > :-/ > > > Very strange. > > Very annoying, definitely. > > I don't know if it's strange yet or not. I think the strangeness > will be confirmed or refuted after finding out why Sendmail isn't > offering AUTH options. > > My favorite thing to turn to when things that used to work and > now don't is to restore a backup of the configuration file and > compare them. Can you do that with your sendmail.cf or > sendmail.mc file? > > There's also a chance that it's your submit.cf or submit.mc file > since we're talking about the MSA on port 587. (Unless you > aren't using the separate MSA which has been standard for 15+ > years.) > > > > -- > Grant. . . . > unix || die > -- Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: How do you spend it? John Covici wb2una cov...@ccs.covici.com