On 06/08/2024 15.56, Arsen Arsenović wrote:
"J. Aho" <gen...@kotiaho.net> writes:
On 05/08/2024 18.30, Daniel Frey wrote:
Is it just me or is wayland nowhere near primetime?
There are still issues with wayland, not sure how up to date this page is:
https://gist.github.com/probonopd/9feb7c20257af5dd915e3a9f2d1f2277
it's either out of date or fearmongering. I'd presume the former if not
for the first emphasised paragraph of the post: "DO NOT USE A WAYLAND
SESSION
It's quite possible as I didn't really read the beginning of the page,
just saw some stuff mentioned that I had seen on other places.
- Wayland breaks screen recording applications - this is false, either
1) screen recording works via portals, or 2) screen recording works
via xwaylandvideobridge
I think there was some merit to that claim some years ago, I'm not into
screen recording so not sure.
- Wayland complicates server-side window decorations - CSD seems logical
to me, at least in large part, so I'm not sure this actually matters.
however, I know that SSD support exists.
I have to say I'm quite anti-CSD myself, much for the lack of having
close on left side and minimize/maximize on the right side of the window
but also the horror of everyone want to make their own look on the CSD
which makes everything to look like microsoft-windows where even
microsoft's own application uses different look.
I don't see the CSD as a specific wayland issue, it has the same issue
in X11 too.
- Wayland breaks window managers - I'm not sure what they mean here
I guess that could be related to X11 window managers that do not support
wayland, but it's like a qt3 application don't run on a system with only
qt6 libraries.
there's a new graphics stack because the old one didn't work, and I'm
not sure where this kind of response to it comes from - it seems similar
to the systemd debacle. see also
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWQh_DmDLKQ (by a former X developer,
so, someone with qualifications)
what these posts /also/ lack is enthusiastic contributors who'll
actually pick up the mantle of maintaining and improving X.
Sure it's far easier to say what "you" think don't work than code.
There was a X11 variant where they had stripped away loads of support
for old stuff, just don't remember the name (most variants of X11 had
been forgotten), and they had some improvements too, but if you don't
get picked up by a major distribution, you will definitely have a lot
harder to break thru to the masses.
I have been using wayland for probably four or so years now, and I've
only so far missed a standard for global shortcuts (note, a _standard
for it_, not a hack-job allowing clients to listen to keystrokes
globally and react to them, leading to weird conflicts and fragmented
configuration; something integrated into desktops, that's not a job of
individual clients to implement, so, really, I'm missing that in X also).
Just make a patch and submit it ;)
My SailfishOS based phone uses wayland and on that it's been working fine, on
my desktop with a nVidia RTX I haven't managed to even login into a wayland
session,
hmm, on my 1050Ti PC I run kde plasma just fine. I don't know anyone
with an RTX card to ask them if it works for them, though - but it could
be some misconfiguration (you need some USE flags on the nvidia drivers
IIRC, and some compositors, like sway, require an extra flag).
I have been using KDE since Havoc called me a troll for pointing out
that you can't have configuration options that has the exact same name
but does different things.
I have rebuilt the whole system, I have tried with other distros, the
same result, I do not get wayland to work on the nVidia, not sure how
many different howto's I have tried to follow, but on the laptop not
much of an issue at all but as I pointed out it's an intel GPU. And my
old mobile it works fine too.
--
//Aho
