-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Mick wrote:
> This is a nice list with helpful people.

No doubt about that. :-)

> There are other lists however, when 
> it is not that rare for malicious (or unhinged) individuals to impersonate 
> someone else and hijack their email address to publish offensive content.  
> After a while using a digital signature (GnuPG or x509) becomes a habit.

That's exactly the case. ;-)

> 
> It doesn't really add that much overhead anyway (197 Bytes for gpg to 3.1k 
> Bytes for s/mime).

That's what I thought. :-)

W. Canis


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkg5qioACgkQKT9zBKF0twUtLACeIKqDkUvBYAMbdN8ZFVB4ujfi
4aMAn1KuvGPgRRNAleEZ2CyKAP5YK4lJ
=wov3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Reply via email to