-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Daniel Iliev wrote: > Come ooon! :) > The whole bet thing was of course a joke. > What I had in mind is that you'd have to hack Gmail which I believe > won't classify as "relatively easy". Not to mention that even just > for "proof of concept" this would be illegal, so I'd never expect you > to do it.
No problem. :-) > > Alright, the most important thing in this discussion appears that we > all agree that signing mails to ML or not, either way there's no harm. > So, I think we'd better stop at this point and let it go. > > Agreed? I have no problem with that. :-) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkhAIVgACgkQKT9zBKF0twVWLQCfWd/4i0XgyOTuHuJIAxv8pq8D Ug0An0q7/0FB909Ox7SMu3qWAtndAQbL =6TZf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
