-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Daniel Iliev wrote: [...] > Absolutely. I just wonder how many people will choose not to use such > kind of list in order not to sacrifice their anonymity.
Exactly. [...] > It also might be the same person signing with different keys or > sometimes signing somtimes - not. What's the difference for the other > guys on the list - in both cases they will get some junk before the > offending account is stopped. What's the difference for the sender - > guilty or not, his address gets blacklisted. Correct. Signing makes only sense if you do it consistently. [...] > Forgot, choosed not to, didn't renew... > I believe it's the majority, but I may be wrong. OK, I forgot the human factor. ;-) [...] > Relatively easy? Well, hereby I give you my blessing and dare you to > send a "proof of concept" message to this list imposing as me. > Additional condition: you must have no other access to Gmail than what > is granted to everyone outside the company. If you succeed I promise to > sign every single email I send from that point on. :) OK, I can't bring myself a "proof of concept". I'm not a evil hacker. But I said "relatively easy", I meant that if you have your own server running (with for example sendmail) and enough criminal energy, know how, I'm pretty sure that it's possible. And I'm also pretty sure that my thinking is much to complicated. Because e-mail abuse is not new and your "proof of concept" is probably since a long time ago produced. ;-) W. Canis -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkg+YNYACgkQKT9zBKF0twVe2QCfZJtt/Squj33IROJMnRNwDk4A 5ZEAn1mTDiyAa6bA7JYKiFE+9ZuaucIi =l5vv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
