On Wednesday 27 August 2008 21:00:11 Benoit St-Pierre, you wrote : > I'm in the planning stages of setting up a file server and am considering > using RAID. > > My concern is that my drive sizes are mixed. I have two 500GB SATA drives, > a 320GB IDE and a 250GB IDE. > > I would like to set these up so that the maximum amount of disk space is > usable, but still be able to recover from any one drive failing. I would > also like to be able to add drives of any size as easily as possible. > > Is it possible to split each disk into a bunch of 10GB partitions, giving > me 157 partitions in total, and specifying that I want to have 50 > partitions worth of parity info so that if any 50 partitions go bad (ie: > one of the 500GB disks) the RAID can recover? Adding/replacing would be > simple if I can change the amount of parity info to keep, but I don't know > if this is actually possible. It looks as though spares need to be > explicitly given so, if a disk with lots of spares goes down, it's not > going to work.
AFAIK, it's not possible to have so much partitions under linux, but i can't remember the maximum of supported partitions... but good luck to manage a so wide number of partitions ! > Another option I see is if I create 4x 250GB partitions (one on each drive) > in one RAID5 array, 3x 70GB partitions (on the 3 larger drives) in another > RAID5 array, and two 120GB in a RAID1 array. The RAID1 array reduces my > total available disk space a bit, which is less than ideal and > adding/replacing disks would be more of a headache. IMHO, i think this could be a solution. This is possible using software RAID as it's in the kernel, and then reassemble created raid partitions in one LVM volume group, so you can use partitions of any space ! > I remember reading something about using LVM and RAID to achieve this, but > everything I've found has been for identical drives. > > Any suggestions? HTH. Xavier Parizet
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
