On Sunday 16 November 2008 11:04:41 William Kenworthy wrote: > dirvish is in portage. > > tar/rsync/cp are not really backups but manual copies. If you want true > backup you need scripts to handle the extra functionality for things > like versioning, archive management and the all important restore. > > Dirvish is excellent on all but restore.
Which raises the question: What's the point of it then? OTOH, it has to be better than legato. Nothing could be worse than legato. -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
