On Sonntag 14 Februar 2010, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 08:01:50 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > > > The OP then doesn't have to deal with 600+ conf-update complaints > > > > > > Run conf-update and press a then d :) > > > > But I'm a paranoid snarky old git and that doesn't work for me! > > But d rejects all the changes, leaving your own configs. To be paranoid > that you are trying to hack your own computer mean you must have MPD too, > and I'm not referring to the Music Player Daemon :) > > > If I get 600 entries in conf-update I feel compelled to examine each > > one and decide individually. Just in case.... > > You may grow out of that, if you have time after reading all those > configs :) > > On a more serious note, conf-update automatically merges trivial changes, > so any configs you ran at the default, which is probably the majority, > won't be flaged at all.
so does cfg-update....
