On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 12:03:40 +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:

> > On a more serious note, conf-update automatically merges trivial
> > changes, so any configs you ran at the default, which is probably the
> > majority, won't be flaged at all.  
> 
> so does cfg-update....

Every now and then, someone mentions cfg-update - usually you :) - and I
give it another try, but I don't really get on with it and always go back
to conf-update. There's nothing specific wrong with it, I just prefer (or
am used to) conf-update.

I expect that if I were still using etc-update or dispatch-conf I would
welcome it with open arms though.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

The modem is the message.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to