On Sunday 14 February 2010 11:32:12 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 12:03:40 +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > > On a more serious note, conf-update automatically merges trivial > > > changes, so any configs you ran at the default, which is probably the > > > majority, won't be flaged at all. > > > > so does cfg-update.... > > Every now and then, someone mentions cfg-update - usually you :) - and I > give it another try, but I don't really get on with it and always go back > to conf-update. There's nothing specific wrong with it, I just prefer (or > am used to) conf-update. > > I expect that if I were still using etc-update or dispatch-conf I would > welcome it with open arms though.
You make me feel out of touch with Gentoo! Is dispatch-conf and etc-update that bad then? -- Regards, Mick
