"The wide range of geoengineering technologies currently being discussed makes 
it prudent that each technique should be evaluated individually for its ethical 
merit."
Amen.  - Greg 



________________________________
From: Andrew Lockley <andrew.lock...@gmail.com>
To: geoengineering <geoengineering@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Sat, November 10, 2012 4:34:02 PM
Subject: [geo] Ethics and geoengineering: reviewing the moral issues raised by 
solar radiation management and carbon dioxide removal - Preston - 2012 - Wiley 
Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change - Wiley Online Library


http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wcc.198/abstract
Ethics and geoengineering: reviewing the moral issues raised by solar radiation 
management and carbon dioxide removal
Christopher J. Preston
Article first published online: 8 NOV 2012
DOI: 10.1002/wcc.198
Abstract
After two decades of failure by the international community to respond 
adequately to the threat of global climate change, discussions of the 
possibility of geoengineering a cooler climate have recently proliferated. 
Alongside the considerable optimism that these technologies have generated, 
there has also been wide acknowledgement of significant ethical concerns. 
Ethicists, social scientists, and experts in governance have begun the work of 
addressing these concerns. The plethora of ethical issues raised by 
geoengineering creates challenges for those who wish to survey them. The issues 
are here separated out according to the temporal spaces in which they first 
arise. Some crop up when merely contemplating the prospect of geoengineering. 
Others appear as research gets underway. Another set of issues attend the 
actual 
implementation of the technologies. A further set occurs when planning for the 
cessation of climate engineering. Two cautions about this organizational schema 
are in order. First, even if the issues first arise in the temporal spaces 
identified, they do not stay completely contained within them. A good reason to 
object to the prospect of geoengineering, for example, will likely remain a 
good 
reason to object to its implementation. Second, the ethical concerns intensify 
or weaken depending on the technology under consideration. The wide range of 
geoengineering technologies currently being discussed makes it prudent that 
each 
technique should be evaluated individually for its ethical merit. 
WIREs Clim Change 2012. 
doi: 10.1002/wcc.198


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.

Reply via email to