The proposal to automatically rewrite names seems pretty complicated. I
have a number of concerns but I want to focus on just one:
The goal is to eliminate ambiguity but the proposal seems to be adding it.
What should happen if a user has an existing configuration with two styles
- one named "foo__bar" and another named "foo::bar"? Or generally how do
we avoid having multiple "unsafe" names translating to the same "safe"
one? I don't think that it is possible to do this and keep it transparent
to old clients.
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Here is the proposal: https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-127
>
--
David Winslow
Software Engineer | Boundless <http://boundlessgeo.com/>
dwins...@boundlessgeo.com
917-388-9085
@boundlessgeo <http://twitter.com/boundlessgeo/>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website,
sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your
hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
