Andrea Aime a écrit :
> Wondering if putting jaxb dependencies at the top of the pom.xml files
> in the xsd modules is going to buy us the desired order...
Adrian tried and it worked for him.
In a little bit longuer term, I wonder if we should consider make the GeoTools
project to evoluate toward a structure like Jakarta - an umbrella for
sub-projects with coherent package names, policies and the same parent pom.xml
and JIRA tracker, but where the "sub-projects" would live in their own OSGEO's
SVN, have their "maven build" process and releases. For other modules like XSD,
running "mvn eclipse" would mount only the JAR rather than the sources, which
would solve Justin's problem since jaxb-dummy do not appears in dependencies. I
guess that peoples could still mount the sources if they wish. It may also
provides a little bit more flexibility for providing many flavors of
referencing, like "with jaxb", "without jaxb", "all in one fat jar", "trimmed
version with only a few selected functionalities" (for those who consider
referencing too big), etc. It would be hard to trick the build for providing
all
those flavors while keeping the same build compile the whole GeoTools projects,
while it may be slightly easier if the build doesn't need to care about modules
after "referencing". It would also reduce the build time for those who don't
work on metadata and referencing.
This is just an idea.
Martin
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
