Andrea Aime wrote: > What would the review consist of? We did go through are dependencies during the providence review; mostly to check their license and make sure we could distribute. This was one of the reasons we pulled the ArcSDE plugin for a year. > Second observation, sorry if a bit sarcastic, but to be fair, shouldn't we > check that every library we're using goes thought a formal review process? > Right now we take the library website at face value. > Did anybody formally check that all the libraries we depend onto are clean > license wise? > Yes it does happen; that was some of the feedback I would get in email that motivated me to take part in the OSGeo incubation process. It happened three times; and only one of the times did I get a list of the problems; usually I just got "we cannot use geotools".
Jody > Cheers > Andrea > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > Geotools-devel mailing list > Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
