Jody Garnett ha scritto: > Andrea Aime wrote: >> What would the review consist of? > We did go through are dependencies during the providence review; mostly > to check their license and make sure we could distribute. This was one > of the reasons we pulled the ArcSDE plugin for a year.
We go thru them all right, checking their license, not their source files, even for the open source libraries, afaik. >> Second observation, sorry if a bit sarcastic, but to be fair, >> shouldn't we check that every library we're using goes thought a >> formal review process? >> > Right now we take the library website at face value. Correct, but here Adrian is asking the library contents to be reviewed, not its published license (at least, that is what I understand from his mail, apologies if I'm misreading it). I did not know we scanned all the source of all the open source libraries we include, did we? Cheers Andrea ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
