On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Niels Charlier <ni...@scitus.be> wrote: > On 08/06/2012 12:23 PM, Niels Charlier wrote: >>> Afaik this works the way I explained before, that is, the Z dimension is >>> left >>> unaltered during the reprojection. >>> Which is not true reprojection, but what we can afford given that the >>> vertical >>> transformation module is not working >>> >> I reprojected from WGS84 to WGS66 which only differ in their Z >> dimension, and the values are being altered. >> I am currently in the process of doing the calculations to see if it is >> indeed mathematically correct, but it is definitely altered. >> > > And I can confirm that the 3d reprojection is indeed 100% mathematically > accurate.
Interesting, maybe it's working properly for full 3D systems (as opposed to compound ones where a 2d system is associated with a vertical CRS). What were the EPSG codes you used? Cheers Andrea -- == Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 962313 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it ------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
