Hi Simone, Thanks for review! In response to your questions
(1) Jody added this note to the proposal and Devon is working on this part, so I think either one of them are best placed to explain this part. (2) Okay, agreed. Regards Niels On 15-04-16 10:39, Simone Giannecchini wrote: > Ciao Niels, > we are looking into this and comparing with some work that have in the > pipeline which might extend the work you are doing with respect to > harvesting. > > I like the general idea pretty much, I have a few quick questions/obs? > > -1- Can you clarify this sentence? > > "to replace the default direct granule access with a renderable graph > (for reprojection)" > > -2- Stupid thing but in ImageMosaic I would go for add/removeRaster > rather than *Coverage > > I will talk to Andrea and Daniele to add more. > > That said, it might be worth to have a look at the code when it start to > settle. > > > > Regards, > Simone Giannecchini > == > GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! > Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. > == > Ing. Simone Giannecchini > @simogeo > Founder/Director > > GeoSolutions S.A.S. > Via di Montramito 3/A > 55054 Massarosa (LU) > Italy > phone: +39 0584 962313 > fax: +39 0584 1660272 > mob: +39 333 8128928 > > http://www.geo-solutions.it > http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it > > ------------------------------------------------------- > AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003 > Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o > nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. > Il loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del > messaggio, per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora > riceviate questo messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo > cortesemente di darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla > distruzione del messaggio stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. > Conservare il messaggio stesso, divulgarlo anche in parte, > distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od utilizzarlo per finalità > diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai principi dettati dal > D.Lgs. 196/2003. > > The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely > for the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be > confidential or proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of > privacy act (Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New > Data Protection Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any > disclosure, reproduction, copying, distribution, or either > dissemination, either whole or partial, is strictly forbidden except > previous formal approval of the named addressee(s). If you are not the > intended recipient, please contact immediately the sender by > telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the information in this message > that has been received in error. The sender does not give any warranty > or accept liability as the content, accuracy or completeness of sent > messages and accepts no responsibility for changes made after they > were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of e-mail > transmission, viruses, etc. > > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Niels Charlier <ni...@scitus.be> wrote: >> Hello Devon, >> >> Directory walking is part of the harvesting process, which is at the moment >> implemented inside the ImageMosaicReader (see the inner class >> HarvestedResource). >> In the API, there is a separate MosaicHarvester interface, as well as a very >> light ImageMosaicReader with all the logic inside the ImageMosaic class. >> With this API, we can either do one of these two thing to customise >> harvesting: >> 1. Write our own reader and use all the mosaic functionality through the >> ImageMosaic class. >> 2. Write our own implementation of MosaicHarvester for a customised >> harvesting process and plug it into the ImageMosaicReader. >> >> Does that make any sense? >> >> Kind Regards >> Niels >> >> >> On 06-04-16 01:48, Devon Tucker wrote: >> >> For my own part, Niels maybe you could throw in some small examples of how >> these API changes would be used in practice to accomplish some of the items >> in the description? For example, how could I customize the directory walking >> with the new API? >> >> Thanks, >> Devon >> >> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Devon Tucker <devonrtuc...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Just noticed that there wasn't a dedicated email thread for this proposal >>> and figured I'd kick one off since I've also been involved in it. >>> >>> >>> https://github.com/geotools/geotools/wiki/Refactor-ImageMosaic-for-extensibility >>> >>> I think the description gives a pretty good rationale for what we want to >>> accomplish with this proposal and I'd like to solicit any discussion, >>> advice, feedback, etc. from everyone. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Devon >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> GeoTools-Devel mailing list >> GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> GeoTools-Devel mailing list >> GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial! https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z _______________________________________________ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
