On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Jan De Moerloose < [email protected]> wrote:
> Andrea, > > big thanks for the explanation, i think it's clear enough for me now. > In principle it means that we can't guarantee binary compatibility on going > from y to y+1. > Well no, even going from x.y to x.y+1 there is no binary compatibility guarantee, that you get only when going from x.y.z to x.y.z+1 Cheers Andrea -- ------------------------------------------------------- Ing. Andrea Aime GeoSolutions S.A.S. Tech lead Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 962313 mob: +39 333 8128928 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/ http://www.youtube.com/user/GeoSolutionsIT http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime http://twitter.com/geowolf -------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free Software Download: Index, Search & Analyze Logs and other IT data in Real-Time with Splunk. Collect, index and harness all the fast moving IT data generated by your applications, servers and devices whether physical, virtual or in the cloud. Deliver compliance at lower cost and gain new business insights. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-dev2dev
_______________________________________________ Geotools-gt2-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users
