Hi Jody,

i think you have a very strong point in that we are not participating in the project as much as we probably should, so if i sounded critical that was certainly not the intention. Maybe it's just that excellent products tend to become invisible for their users (until you ran into a problem, of course...:-) ? Anyhow, i think we might have a chance to contribute in a couple of areas (working up towards that steering committee) , i will set up separate threads for that.

Cheers,
Jan


On 3/03/2011 2:02, Jody Garnett wrote:
Thinking.

That is darn annoying as changing the return type to be more specific is part of Java (since Java 5). It did not occur to me that that would break reflection? The returned SimpleFeatureSource is still a FeatureSource.
I was surprised myself. The code simply compiles, of course, and since we are open source, i think we should probably put binary compatibility in question.

I can think of a workaround; but I am not sure if they will ... work.
- You can try wrapping with a dynamic proxy; and route the method as appropriate

Other than that we try our best to give a full release cycle before any deprecated method is removed. As andrea indicated the project cycles on the point release. This is an artifact from when we tracked the geoapi project; so a full release would only occur when geoapi changed the implementation target.

The other thing I ask is that you watch the request for changes that go buy the GeoTools list and evaluate them against the impact to your project. As a major user of GeoTools you can work towards being involved and sitting on the steering committee.

We do try and respect the opinion of committers on the project; but being on the steering committee gets you a vote (in addition to some work with respect project wide changes).

--
Jody Garnett

On Monday, 28 February 2011 at 9:40 PM, Jan De Moerloose wrote:

Hello,

while upgrading to geotools 2.7-RC2 i am getting the following error on
2.6 code:

Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
org.geotools.data.DataStore.getFeatureSource(Ljava/lang/String;)Lorg/geotools/data/FeatureSource;
at
org.geomajas.layer.shapeinmem.FFeatureSourceRetriever.getFeatureSource(FeatureSourceRetriever.java:81)
~[classes/:na]
at
org.geomajas.layer.shapeinmem.ShapeInMemLayer.initFeatures(ShapeInMemLayer.java:221)
~[classes/:na]
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
~[na:1.6.0_18]

Apparently the return type of getFeatureSource() has changed to a
subtype of FeatureSource called SimpleFeatureSource.
I suppose the signature change is intentionally, but it causes a big
problem for us as we try to adhere to a strict api contract for our
Geomajas project (no recompilation of old code for upgrades).

I would like to know if there is a fix possible that does not require
recompiling the 2.6 code (i doubt it from a java view point) ?
If not, should we expect similar issues with upcoming minor version
upgrades or is this an exceptional case ?

Thank you for your help,
Jan

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free Software Download: Index, Search & Analyze Logs and other IT data in Real-Time with Splunk. Collect, index and harness all the fast moving IT data generated by your applications, servers and devices whether physical, virtual
or in the cloud. Deliver compliance at lower cost and gain new business
insights. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Geotools-gt2-users mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users



--
Sincerely,
Jan De Moerloose

Geosparc n.v.
http://www.geosparc.com
sponsor of http://www.geomajas.org

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free Software Download: Index, Search & Analyze Logs and other IT data in 
Real-Time with Splunk. Collect, index and harness all the fast moving IT data 
generated by your applications, servers and devices whether physical, virtual
or in the cloud. Deliver compliance at lower cost and gain new business 
insights. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-dev2dev 
_______________________________________________
Geotools-gt2-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users

Reply via email to