On 03/03/2011 02:02 AM, Jody Garnett wrote: > Thinking. > > That is darn annoying as changing the return type to be more specific > is part of Java (since Java 5). It did not occur to me that that would > break reflection? The returned SimpleFeatureSource is still a > FeatureSource. The "problem" is that we require binary compatibility in our API contract, so even a recompile is "too much".
> The other thing I ask is that you watch the request for changes that > go buy the GeoTools list and evaluate them against the impact to your > project. We do trying to do that. I know we should be more active on GeoTools. We are still a young project and we all try to juggle to get everything done. I hope we can become more active in the near future. > As a major user of GeoTools you can work towards being involved and > sitting on the steering committee. That would indeed be good. But I guess we have start by contributing more. Kind regards, Joachim -- Joachim Van der Auwera Geosparc, supporting the Geomajas GIS community ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free Software Download: Index, Search & Analyze Logs and other IT data in Real-Time with Splunk. Collect, index and harness all the fast moving IT data generated by your applications, servers and devices whether physical, virtual or in the cloud. Deliver compliance at lower cost and gain new business insights. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Geotools-gt2-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users
