Hi all,

An interesting thread (especially all that followed), and one
that I have a few observations about:

1) WRT the 'tractor net' mentioned below: I recall all of the careful work that went into normalizing 'official' observations so that urban heat island and climate change impacts could be accurately documented. Knowing the circumstances associated with each sensor (was it located too close to a building / heat source, etc.) was vital in obtaining the results. Such research would (at least currently, and possibly always?) be impossible using citizen-sensor data.

2) An entomologist told me of a ladybug survey, wherein people were asked to record their observations. Even though all they had to do was record the # of spots (more or less), fully 30-40% of the observations were incorrect. Such results do not give me confidence in the quality of volunteered information beyond that which is of a personal nature. Of course, maybe ladybug spots are difficult to correctly count, and the results of soil surveys taken by farmers (where their tax rate might depend on the reported fertility of their soil) much more accurately reported--only time will tell. But then, maybe not: who will be able to (and how would we be able to) re-determine the accuracy of the survey?

3) The short half-life of so much that is on the web (Koehler), and the ever-increasing number of mash-ups and neogeography sites makes it impossible to keep track of where things are. So, while VGI may be seen as the replacement for 'official' information (which was one of the central messages coming out of Goodchild's talk), at least I know that going to, for example, Geoconnections or GeoBase will enable me to locate 90%+ of the official information that is available. I recognize that in the future a solution will be found, one that will enable you to search for all of the VGI within a specified geographic region, but once again we'll have to determine the quality associated with each source (and, also, for each participant).

4) As my grad student (Alan McConchie) so eloquently stated in the conclusion to his thesis (Mapping Mashups: Participation, Collaboration and Critique on the World Wide Web): "When the era of mashups is over, replaced by whatever comes next, will anything remain but scattered screenshots and textual descriptions? How then will a history of mashups be written? Will there be a Brian Harley of mashups?" And, if there isn't one, would the noegeographers even notice (re RS's comments)?

Just some random musings from an observer on the edge, after
two days of turkey,

Brian

-----------------------------------
Koehler, Wallace. 2004. A longitudinal study of Web pages continued: a consideration of document persistence. Information Research 9, no. 2.
------------------------------------------------------------
Brian Klinkenberg            Visit E-Flora BC (eflora.bc.ca)
http://www.geog.ubc.ca/~brian              [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Department of Geography, U.B.C.            Tel: 604 822-2663
1984 West Mall, Vancouver BC  V6T 1Z2      Fax: 604 822-6150

On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, michael gould wrote:

To me VGI is less about the apps (whereas ng does seem to focus there) and
more about the nature of GI that is collected bottom-up instead of the
traditional top-down manner i.e. by state mapping agencies. This opens all
sorts of doors regarding sampling density, standardization, quality control,
power, control, officiality of data, update frequency (freshness), discovery
mechanisms, ontologies and folksonomies, sensor networks,....and the list
goes on.  An example of the difference is comparing weather forecasts
produced by a central agency covering an entire country... based on a few
hundred met stations spread every x kilometres; and a future network of
millions of farm tractors in the fields, each porting GSP receivers and mini
weather stations. Want to know the weather near your house NOW? Ask the
tractor-net nodes near you, not the agency that updates every half hour at
low resolution.

______________________________________________
Michael Gould
Dept. Information Systems (LSI)
Universitat Jaume I, 12071 Castell?n, Spain.
email: gould (at) lsi.uji.es
www.geoinfo.uji.es


-----Mensaje original-----
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: lunes, 13 de octubre de 2008 3:58
Para: [email protected]
Asunto: Geowanking Digest, Vol 59, Issue 15

Send Geowanking mailing list submissions to
        [email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Geowanking digest..."


Today's Topics:

  1. Re: beyond wanking (Eric Wolf)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 19:57:53 -0600
From: "Eric Wolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Geowanking] beyond wanking
To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

On the issue of names...

I need to talk to Goodchild the next time I see him about his reasoning
behind VGI...
There is a valid argument against the term "neogeography" mainly from the
perspective that it belittles Geography. As someone who is pursuing a PhD in
Geography mostly as a geowanker in a department filled with brilliant human
and physical geographers, I understand wholly how "neogeography" undervalues
their efforts. My friend and classmate who is studying how varieties of rice
relate to perceptions of "good people" in China is not at all concerned with
what's happening on the Internet in terms of end-users producing GISystems
and creating data. Neither is my other friend and classmate who is
attempting to model moulins in Greenland to better understand how the ice
sheet is melting. These two people are Geographers. I am a Geographer as
well - but what I do is most related to the "neogeographers".

Geowanking is, in my mind, a much better term because it doesn't devalue the
efforts of my friends.

Wank on!
-Eric



On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 6:30 AM, michael gould <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Just for the record I was not advocating a change in the gw name; was just
commenting on goodchild's attempt to find a serious name (VGI) for certain
research activity.

In my opinion gw is just a fun name, and is appropriate to this informal
forum.


______________________________________________
Michael Gould
Dept. Information Systems (LSI)
Universitat Jaume I, 12071 Castell?n, Spain.
email: gould (at) lsi.uji.es
www.geoinfo.uji.es
**************

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:01:18 +0100
From: "Andrew Turner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Geowanking] Beyond wanking
To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
       <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Dan Brickley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I wonder whether it is time to take a fresh look at the name of this
very forum.

If we want the boring/serious/grownup GIS world to take more notice of
the kinds of things that are discussed around here, having a mailing
list with a different name would help.


No, the name of this forum is inline with its goals. To be an open, and
semi-tongue-in-cheek venue for people to be free and air crazy ideas.
Geowanking is not meant to be for serious discussions or to get published
as
a forum in the NYT.

There are other, better forums for that - and more importantly are focused
on more specific topics. I feel that serious, cross-pollinating
discussions
should happen there. It is up to any of us to participate in those
communities, and if members of those groups want to "play in the dirt"
then
they can join Geowankers.

I say this having done just that - I am now on a number of Geography
lists,
OGC meetings, and other "professional" and serious venues and attempt to
keep the appropriate voice and injection of new concepts there as much as
we
can be open with our thoughts here.

Cheers,
Andrew


------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:07:55 -0600
From: "Eric Wolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Geowanking] Beyond wanking
To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
       <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

We need a geowanking just as much as we need a big, international FOSS4G
conference. Different ends of the spectrum...
And my boss lurks on the list...

-Eric

On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 9:01 AM, Andrew Turner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Dan Brickley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I wonder whether it is time to take a fresh look at the name of this
very forum.

If we want the boring/serious/grownup GIS world to take more notice
of the kinds of things that are discussed around here, having a
mailing list with a different name would help.


No, the name of this forum is inline with its goals. To be an open,
and semi-tongue-in-cheek venue for people to be free and air crazy
ideas. Geowanking is not meant to be for serious discussions or to get
published as a forum in the NYT.

There are other, better forums for that - and more importantly are
focused on more specific topics. I feel that serious,
cross-pollinating discussions should happen there. It is up to any of
us to participate in those communities, and if members of those groups
want to "play in the dirt" then they can join Geowankers.

I say this having done just that - I am now on a number of Geography
lists, OGC meetings, and other "professional" and serious venues and
attempt to keep the appropriate voice and injection of new concepts
there as much as we can be open with our thoughts here.

Cheers,
Andrew
_______________________________________________
Geowanking mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking




--
-=--=---=----=----=---=--=-=--=---=----=---=--=-=-
Eric B. Wolf                          720-209-6818
USGS Geographer
Center of Excellence in GIScience
PhD Student
CU-Boulder - Geography
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:


http://lists.burri.to/pipermail/geowanking/attachments/20081010/86bac5dd/att

achment-0001.htm<http://lists.burri.to/pipermail/geowanking/attachments/2008
1010/86bac5dd/attachment-0001.htm>

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:15:00 -0500
From: "P Kishor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Geowanking] Beyond wanking
To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
       <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

We need geowanking. If we need to suit it up and make it VC friendly, we
can
call it GeoWanking, Inc., or GeoWanking, Ph.D. to make the academia happy.
For those with class-aspirations, how about GeoWanking, Esq.

Maybe iGeowanking for those of us who admire the bondi-blue iMacs.
Otherwise, let geowanking be.

And, it is ok if there are a few who don't understand what wanking means.
For those who do, it serves as a source of a quite chuckle.

And those who get their knickers in a knot over VGI can piss off as well.
It
is as good a term as geowanking is in all its expression and shortcomings
alike.


On 10/10/08, Dan Brickley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
michael gould wrote:

> On the VGI term that most everyone here seems to hate
(not-invented-here?):
>
> (Professor) Goodchild tried to coin a term sufficiently serious and
credible  > for the academic world (where geowanking becomes something
like "popular  > prototyping of innovative geographic applications"!),
while conveying the  > basic notions behind neogeography and other
similar "memes". He did not  > intend for the term to overly focus on
the data, just as I suppose  > "neogeography" was not intended to
overly focus on things that (only)  > geographers do.
>
> Applying to both comments: we don't all need to become one
homogeneous mass  > and think and talk alike... ?viva la diversidad!

 Quite.

 Dear Geo Wankers,

 I wonder whether it is time to take a fresh look at the name of this
very forum.

 To many English speakers, the word "wanking" is a reference to
masturbation. Try explaining to your boss (some people still have
 bosses...) that you're spending your time with "geo"wankers that you
met  on the Internet. And if your boss isn't a native English speaker,
try  finding a dictionary that will help them understand what "wanking"
is.

 If we want the boring/serious/grownup GIS world to take more notice
of  the kinds of things that are discussed around here, having a
mailing  list with a different name would help.

 I understand that to some US-American ears, "wanking" has a less
graphic, and less sexual reading. But still ... looking around in
dictionary etc sites, the meaning is still pretty strong (see below).

 May I suggest that a move away from (geo)wanking might help this
community erm... better cross-fertilise with others?

 cheers,

 Dan

 ps. this could be done by a bit of mail aliasing/sysadmin I hope,
rather  than mass resubscription to a new list


 http://www.thefreedictionary.com/wank
 [[
 wank  (wngk) Chiefly British Vulgar Slang  tr. & intr.v. wanked,
wank?ing, wanks  To masturbate. Often used with off.
 n.
 1. An act of masturbation.
 2. A detestable person.
 ]]

 [[
 Noun    1.      wank - slang for masturbation
 hand job, jacking off, jerking off
 masturbation, onanism - manual stimulation of the genital organs (of
yourself or another) for sexual pleasure  jargon, lingo, patois,
argot, vernacular, slang, cant - a characteristic  language of a
particular group (as among thieves); "they don't speak our  lingo"
 Verb    1.      wank - get sexual gratification through
self-stimulation
 jack off, jerk off, she-bop, masturbate, fuck off  masturbate -
stimulate sexually; "The old man wanted to be masturbated  by the
prostitute"
 scarf - masturbate while strangling oneself  excite, stir, stimulate
- stir feelings in; "stimulate my appetite";  "excite the audience";
"stir emotions"
 Based on WordNet 3.0, Farlex clipart collection. (c) 2003-2008
Princeton  University, Farlex Inc.
 ]]


http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Wank%20(w%27ank%3B%20n%
2C%20adj.)
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wank



 _______________________________________________
 Geowanking mailing list
 [email protected]
 http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking



--
Puneet Kishor http://punkish.eidesis.org/ Nelson Institute for
Environmental
Studies http://www.nelson.wisc.edu/ Open Source Geospatial Foundation
(OSGeo) http://www.osgeo.org/


------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 23:19:55 +0800
From: Tim Bowden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Geowanking] Beyond wanking
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [email protected]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8


On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 10:15 -0500, P Kishor wrote:
We need geowanking. If we need to suit it up and make it VC friendly,
we can call it GeoWanking, Inc., or GeoWanking, Ph.D. to make the
academia happy. For those with class-aspirations, how about
GeoWanking, Esq.

Maybe iGeowanking for those of us who admire the bondi-blue iMacs.
Otherwise, let geowanking be.

And, it is ok if there are a few who don't understand what wanking
means. For those who do, it serves as a source of a quite chuckle.

And those who get their knickers in a knot over VGI can piss off as
well. It is as good a term as geowanking is in all its expression and
shortcomings alike.


Well said!  Happy iGeowanking, Esq!

Tim Bowden

On 10/10/08, Dan Brickley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
michael gould wrote:

> On the VGI term that most everyone here seems to hate
(not-invented-here?):
>
> (Professor) Goodchild tried to coin a term sufficiently serious and
credible
> for the academic world (where geowanking becomes something like
"popular
> prototyping of innovative geographic applications"!), while
conveying
the
> basic notions behind neogeography and other similar "memes". He did
not
> intend for the term to overly focus on the data, just as I suppose
> "neogeography" was not intended to overly focus on things that
(only)
> geographers do.
>
> Applying to both comments: we don't all need to become one
homogeneous mass
> and think and talk alike... ?viva la diversidad!

 Quite.

 Dear Geo Wankers,

 I wonder whether it is time to take a fresh look at the name of this
 very forum.

 To many English speakers, the word "wanking" is a reference to
 masturbation. Try explaining to your boss (some people still have
 bosses...) that you're spending your time with "geo"wankers that you
met
 on the Internet. And if your boss isn't a native English speaker, try
 finding a dictionary that will help them understand what "wanking"
is.

 If we want the boring/serious/grownup GIS world to take more notice
of
 the kinds of things that are discussed around here, having a mailing
 list with a different name would help.

 I understand that to some US-American ears, "wanking" has a less
 graphic, and less sexual reading. But still ... looking around in
 dictionary etc sites, the meaning is still pretty strong (see below).

 May I suggest that a move away from (geo)wanking might help this
 community erm... better cross-fertilise with others?

 cheers,

 Dan

 ps. this could be done by a bit of mail aliasing/sysadmin I hope,
rather
 than mass resubscription to a new list


 http://www.thefreedictionary.com/wank
 [[
 wank  (wngk) Chiefly British Vulgar Slang
 tr. & intr.v. wanked, wank?ing, wanks
 To masturbate. Often used with off.
 n.
 1. An act of masturbation.
 2. A detestable person.
 ]]

 [[
 Noun    1.      wank - slang for masturbation
 hand job, jacking off, jerking off
 masturbation, onanism - manual stimulation of the genital organs (of
 yourself or another) for sexual pleasure
 jargon, lingo, patois, argot, vernacular, slang, cant - a
characteristic
 language of a particular group (as among thieves); "they don't speak
our
 lingo"
 Verb    1.      wank - get sexual gratification through
self-stimulation
 jack off, jerk off, she-bop, masturbate, fuck off
 masturbate - stimulate sexually; "The old man wanted to be
masturbated
 by the prostitute"
 scarf - masturbate while strangling oneself
 excite, stir, stimulate - stir feelings in; "stimulate my appetite";
 "excite the audience"; "stir emotions"
 Based on WordNet 3.0, Farlex clipart collection. (c) 2003-2008
Princeton
 University, Farlex Inc.
 ]]




http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Wank%20(w%27ank%3B%20n%2C%20a
dj.)
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wank



 _______________________________________________
 Geowanking mailing list
 [email protected]
 http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking




_______________________________________________
Geowanking mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking




--
-=--=---=----=----=---=--=-=--=---=----=---=--=-=-
Eric B. Wolf                          720-209-6818
USGS Geographer
Center of Excellence in GIScience
PhD Student
CU-Boulder - Geography
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.burri.to/pipermail/geowanking/attachments/20081012/c1b0e944/att
achment.htm

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Geowanking mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking

End of Geowanking Digest, Vol 59, Issue 15
******************************************

_______________________________________________
Geowanking mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking

_______________________________________________
Geowanking mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking

Reply via email to