On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 09:18:19PM -0500, Ian Chapman wrote: > Hi Tristan, > I did not run at that stage only. Retesting the original I get;- > ghdl -a xxx.vhd --okay and generated xxx.o > ghdl -e yyy --okay generated the e~yyy.o plus yyy executable > I do not have a testbench just for that part so I'll try running to see > what it does there are still lots of bugs in my code but this is what it > gives.
Fine. > ghdl -r yyy > ../../../src/ieee/numeric_std-body.v93:1613:7:@0ms:(assertion warning): > NUMERIC_STD."=": metavalue detected, returning FALSE > ../../../src/ieee/numeric_std-body.v93:1613:7:@0ms:(assertion warning): > NUMERIC_STD."=": metavalue detected, returning FALSE > ../../../src/ieee/numeric_std-body.v93:1613:7:@0ms:(assertion warning): > NUMERIC_STD."=": metavalue detected, returning FALSE > ../../../src/ieee/numeric_std-body.v93:1613:7:@0ms:(assertion warning): > NUMERIC_STD."=": metavalue detected, returning FALSE > ../../../src/ieee/numeric_std-body.v93:1613:7:@0ms:(assertion warning): > NUMERIC_STD."=": metavalue detected, returning FALSE > ../../../src/ieee/numeric_std-body.v93:1613:7:@0ms:(assertion warning): > NUMERIC_STD."=": metavalue detected, returning FALSE > ../../../src/ieee/numeric_std-body.v93:1613:7:@0ms:(assertion warning): > NUMERIC_STD."=": metavalue detected, returning FALSE As you may know, this is because you are doing numeric operations with uninitialized variables or signals. Might be OK or not. Tristan. _______________________________________________ Ghdl-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss
