On Sat, 2014-02-01 at 15:00 -0500, Adam Jensen wrote:
> On Sat, 01 Feb 2014 10:54:43 +0000
> Brian Drummond <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Can you apply this patch over a clean 0.31 and report if it fixes your
> > issues?
> > 
> > https://sourceforge.net/p/ghdl-updates/code/ci/74c33ea9f3bcaf833c6683114a4d90c8684cfff2/
> > 
> > If so, I believe we're ready for a Windows release.
> > 
> 
> Will this be a 0.31-maintenance release or a 0.32 release? I am
> currently working on an OpenBSD port. Several patches will need to be
> submitted after I resolve all of the build issues and refine/integrate
> the changes. It might be another two or three weeks if all goes well,
> longer otherwise. Is there anything like a release schedule so I can
> coordinate my activities?

I'm delighted to hear there's a port release in process!
This round of (binary/package/port) releases is based on the 0.31 source
package plus the MINIMUM set of patches required to successfully build
each OS package.

As such, you are in charge of your local patch; David (unofficially) is
in charge of the OSX patch, Joris for any Debian patch (I think, none)
etc; none of these are added to the 0.31 branch. Thus coordination is
not an issue : 0.31 is released - as source - ports and binaries catch
up as soon as is practicable.

Separately from these 0.31 packages, your patches should be rebased
(probably trivial!) and submitted to the 0.32dev trunk so that 0.32 will
(or should) build smoothly for everybody, and all packages can be
coordinated with the 0.32 source release.

- Brian


_______________________________________________
Ghdl-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss

Reply via email to