thisisnic commented on a change in pull request #10269:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/10269#discussion_r634139678
##########
File path: r/tests/testthat/test-RecordBatch.R
##########
@@ -415,14 +414,42 @@ test_that("record_batch() handles null type
(ARROW-7064)", {
expect_equivalent(batch$schema, schema(a = int32(), n = null()))
})
-test_that("record_batch() scalar recycling", {
- skip("Not implemented (ARROW-11705)")
+test_that("record_batch() scalar recycling with vectors", {
expect_data_frame(
record_batch(a = 1:10, b = 5),
tibble::tibble(a = 1:10, b = 5)
)
})
+test_that("record_batch() scalar recycling with Scalars, Arrays, and
ChunkedArrays", {
+
+ expect_data_frame(
+ record_batch(a = Array$create(1:10), b = Scalar$create(5)),
+ tibble::tibble(a = 1:10, b = 5)
+ )
+
+ expect_data_frame(
+ record_batch(a = Array$create(1:10), b = Array$create(5)),
+ tibble::tibble(a = 1:10, b = 5)
+ )
+
+ expect_data_frame(
+ record_batch(a = Array$create(1:10), b = ChunkedArray$create(5)),
+ tibble::tibble(a = 1:10, b = 5)
+ )
+
+})
+
+test_that("record_batch() no recycling with tibbles", {
Review comment:
I had a think about this, and `tibble::tibble` does support tibble
recycling, so if we're trying to allow similar behaviour, I think it makes
sense to implement it here.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
