berkaysynnada commented on code in PR #10650: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10650#discussion_r1615535832
########## datafusion/core/src/datasource/file_format/csv.rs: ########## @@ -301,13 +296,7 @@ impl CsvFormat { while let Some(chunk) = stream.next().await.transpose()? { let format = arrow::csv::reader::Format::default() - .with_header( - first_chunk - && self - .options - .has_header - .unwrap_or(state.config_options().catalog.has_header), - ) + .with_header(first_chunk && self.options.has_header) Review Comment: Thanks @metegenez for the review :) I have tried to extract the option from the catalog in the most inclusive way possible. This step seems to be when we create a `TableProvider`. Another alternative would be to consult the catalog wherever we read the header from a `FileFormat`. However, doing this everywhere makes the code cluttered (in many places, there isn't even a catalog object available). Therefore, I think that if we check this once during the execution, where `FileFormat` is first introduced—that is, at the part where `TableProvider` is created—we won't need to check it again. Are there any use cases for creating and using `FileFormat` independently of any `TableProvider`? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org