| > Or we could switch to different quotation brackets altogether for | > quasiquotation, the obvious possibility being <|...blah...|>, and | > <pads|...blah...|>. That would not be hard, and would only affect the | > handful of current quasiquote users. But it'd remove "<|" and "|>" as a | > valid operators, at least for quasiquote customers. I don't know how bad | > that would be. | | Good brackets are scarce. I'd prefer to stick with one of the many | fine variations on [|...|] currently being discussed.
I agree with this. My gut feel is to stick with [| ..|] and variants, and live with the fact that TH and QQ aren't using them in quite the same way. S _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
