marlowsd: > On 03/02/2010 15:39, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: >> |> Or we could switch to different quotation brackets altogether for >> |> quasiquotation, the obvious possibility being<|...blah...|>, and >> |> <pads|...blah...|>. That would not be hard, and would only affect the >> |> handful of current quasiquote users. But it'd remove "<|" and "|>" as a >> |> valid operators, at least for quasiquote customers. I don't know how bad >> |> that would be. >> | >> | Good brackets are scarce. I'd prefer to stick with one of the many >> | fine variations on [|...|] currently being discussed. >> >> I agree with this. My gut feel is to stick with [| ..|] and variants, and >> live with the fact that TH and QQ aren't using them in quite the same way. > > Why not provide some nice Unicode version too? ⟦ .. ⟧ ⟪ .. ⟫ ⦃ .. ⦄ etc. >
OH! That looks very nice. _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users