On 03/02/2010 15:39, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
|> Or we could switch to different quotation brackets altogether for
|> quasiquotation, the obvious possibility being<|...blah...|>, and
|> <pads|...blah...|>. That would not be hard, and would only affect the
|> handful of current quasiquote users. But it'd remove "<|" and "|>" as a
|> valid operators, at least for quasiquote customers. I don't know how bad
|> that would be.
|
| Good brackets are scarce. I'd prefer to stick with one of the many
| fine variations on [|...|] currently being discussed.
I agree with this. My gut feel is to stick with [| ..|] and variants, and live
with the fact that TH and QQ aren't using them in quite the same way.
Why not provide some nice Unicode version too? ⟦ .. ⟧ ⟪ .. ⟫ ⦃ .. ⦄ etc.
Cheers,
Simon
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
