On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 13:11 -0800, Michael Lewis wrote: > Phil Hays wrote: > > I'd like to hear where you (or these un-named climate scientists) break > > with the consensus. > > > > Do you think that energy is conserved? > > Do you think that CO2's spectrum has been measured incorrectly? > > Or is there something wrong in the physics of radiation? > > Or in the accounting of human added CO2 in the atmosphere? > > > > Or ... what? > >
> Complex adaptive systems are unpredictable. Therefore linear > mathematical models can never predict complex adaptive systems reactions > to specific input. The further down the timeline one attempts > predictions, the farther off they will be. So then a small input like a little change in CO2 level or in the distribution of sunlight due to orbit change would not correlate with the climate over a long time interval. Is this a fair statement of your position? If not, please restate it. -- Phil Hays <[email protected]> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of global environmental change. Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not gratuitously rude. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
