On October 18, 2007, TARogue sent me the following: > The fix needs to be in the list, not the reader.
Before there is a fix, I think there needs to be a problem. The original complaint was that "abuse" of reply-to could lead to this "cancer". If people are simply smart enough to trim down their recipients to only the people they think want the reply, then there's no progressive header growth. In fact, not everyone in the thread needs to do this, as long as some percentage of the thread repliers don't include all the previous recipients in their To and Cc headers, then the headers remain managable. It's only when every replier always hits reply-to-all does the problem grow without bounds. -- Chip Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://weblog.2bithacker.net/ GCM/IT d+(-) s+:++ a26>? C++ UB++++$ P+++$ L- E--- W++ N@ o K- w O M+ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t+@ R@ tv@ b++@ DI++++ D+(-) G++ e>++ h>++ r-- y? _______________________________________________ gnhlug-discuss mailing list gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
