I know you're asking Rob, but I'm wading in with my opinion because I have some time :-)
I don't think it matters much, but I think it would be less confusing for our audience if GNHLUG were associated with Linux instead of windows. There is another OSS/FS group forming that is taking care of the non-Linux platforms. (Although they're not tackling the libraries per se, they are tackling the non-Linux platforms - and maybe some Linux too). --Bruce On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 07:27, Ed Lawson wrote: > Rob: > > Has the issue of whether the software should be for Linux only or can be > for Windows also been hashed out? I see value in providing OSS for > Windows, but that was met with opposition in the past as I recall by > people who rightfully said GNHLUG is, after all, a Linux users Group and > not an Open source advocacy group.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
