On Wednesday 11 April 2007 11:15, Heather Brodeur wrote:
> Jim Kuzdrall wrote:
> > Regarding the announcements, has it been decided that an issue
> > 10 days, 7 days, and 1 day before the event is more effective than
> > 7 days and 1 day? If every gnhLUG event gives 3 announcements,
> > might it start to border on spam and get ignored.
>
> The 10 day announcement was a replacement for the missing verbal
> announcement at the previous meeting, and subsequent lack of info on
> the wiki schedule. I didn't want to delay telling people what the
> topic of the meeting was just to conform to the set schedule, but
> didn't necessarily want to disrupt your schedule. I don't have a
> problem with skipping the 7 day announcement this month in an effort
> to avoid spamming people. Ideally going forward we won't have this
> situation arise again, because I will be diligent in my duties and
> will always know "next month's topic at this month's meeting."
>
> I apologize for any confusion I have caused.
Roger-dodger. I will skip the Thursday announcement. Next
Wednesday, I will send Ben's nicely done announcement "as is" so people
will know it is the second coming of the original, not something new.
Jim Kuzdrall
_______________________________________________
gnhlug-org mailing list
gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org/
