On Wednesday 11 April 2007 18:35, Ben Scott wrote:
> On 4/11/07, Jim Kuzdrall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 1) 1 week before.  Prior to that, people don't know their
> > schedules.
>
>   I dispute that.  :)  I've heard from different people on different
> occasions that they would have been able to make such-and-such a
> meeting if they had had more advanced notice.  Some people really do
> plan ahead.  The concept is foreign to me, but I know well that "me
> != everybody".

    Ah, Ben, you must apply the powerful methods of Asimov's 
Psycho-history to any statement involving a group of people.  That is, 
the mathematics of statistics underlies my assertion.

    Consider a gas, say nitrogen, in thermal equilibrium at 298 degrees 
Kelvin.  Do all the molecules have a thermal energy equivalent to 
298deg_K?  Heavens no.  Some may have an energy corresponding to 
1000deg_K and others may be at absolute zero.  In fact, 
probabilistically, there may be no molecule is at exactly at 298deg_K 
energy during some rare instants.

    What we can say, however, is that about half of the molecules are 
below 298deg_K energy on the average.

    Now, back to the competing conditions of knowing ones schedule and 
being able to change it.  Taking the ensemble of quasi-independent 
people viewing the list and assuming their scheduling parameters fit 
Gaussian statistics, there is a point where an equal number do not know 
their schedules and a like number cannot change their schedules.

    These groups do not necessarily comprise the whole ensemble - in 
fact, it is unlikely that they do.  However, they are an important 
subgroup of gnhLUG and their needs are appropriately addressed as I 
have suggested.

    The cited divide was at 7 days, but truly my point was to introduce 
these competing problems of the subgroup.  Of all people, Ben, I would 
have expected you to generalize the obviously statistical statement to 
that conclusion.

    Perhaps someone has a group psychology handbook nearby and can look 
up these parameters for a typical population of IT professionals.  I am 
sure it has been studied.  However, in lieu of more authoritative data, 
you are welcome to take my studied estimate.

Jim Kuzdrall
 
_______________________________________________
gnhlug-org mailing list
gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org/

Reply via email to