Maybe he meant that their current IT people didn't know more
Linux than the students, and the current IT people didn't want to
learn anything new. It does eat up a lot of time re-re-learning M$,
and that doesn't leave much time to learn Linux, or anything else.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> He said cost was not an issue for NT since the
> software from MS could be obtained for little cost and it was easy to
> obtain MS certified people. On the other hand Linux knowledgeable
> people were hard to find, more expensive, and he thought it would be
> hard for the current staff to learn Linux.
Bob Sparks
Never attribute to malice, that which can be explained by stupidity.
Never attribute to stupidity, that which can be explained by lack of
information.
**********************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
*body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
unsubscribe gnhlug
**********************************************************
