"Kenneth E. Lussier" wrote:
> Paul Lussier wrote:
>
> > IMO, if more comapanies did that, more customers would trust the companies
> > they do business with. There's nothing wrong in admitting that your product
> > falls short. If it's important enough, then the answer should be "This is a
> > problem, and we are working on fixing it." Or at least come out and say
> > something like "Yeah, we know about that, but we not enough people have
> > complained to make it a priority yet."
>
> This is Cisco's standard answer. "We know about the bug, and it will be
> fixed in the next release". It's extremely annoying to hear over and
> over again, but for the most part, when the next release is available,
> that bug is fixed. There are a whole bunch of *NEW* bugs, but the old
> ones are gone ;-)
>
> Kenny
>
> **********************************************************
> To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
> *body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
> unsubscribe gnhlug
> **********************************************************
who cares if microcrap is down ? you just wont be able to patch your nice new
shiny windows NT server to be used in production and be forced to put in an old
beatup half price server running linux to do the same job :)
-D
**********************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
*body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
unsubscribe gnhlug
**********************************************************
