"Alfred M\. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Are `tla-fork' and `tla-commit' your own custom scripts? > > tla-fork is Miles' work, tla-commit is my own. > > Are they available in current tla version tarball? > > No. > > If not, then your ``ditto for tla'' is simply not true for majority > of tla users... > > And the majority of users don't have bzr installed, so it simply isn't > true for bzr.
I'd guess the majority of users don't have tla (or baz) installed, either. (They'll have CVS, and maybe in a year or two subversion.) If they install bzr, they'll get the bahaviour described, if they install tla, they probably won't get tla-fork and tla-commit. Probably more significantly, the relevant tutorials probably (rightly, IMHO) emphasize the built-in behaviours of the various tools rather than the things that might be possible if the user is interested enough to hunt down various scripts. So I don't think it's unreasonable to compare how tools behave in their default installed state, as described by their tutorials. Comparing how scriptable the tools are is also useful information, of course. [...] _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
