On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 01:07:39PM +0200, Karel Gardas wrote: > On Tue, 18 Oct 2005, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > >I haven't seen such a ridiculous comparison since the last time > >somebody was playing partisan power games about revision control > >systems. It was clearly deliberately engineered to be as favourable as > >possible to one - pure political noise. This is exactly the sort of > >crap I was talking about earlier. > > Andrew, do you agree that tla UI is kind of complex especially in > comparison with other alternatives?
No, all the other alternatives are pretty much the same, except when they're being deliberately biased by the person reporting them - typically by comparing the most complicated form of one to the simplest form of another. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
