On 4/4/06, Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Right, but what effect does that have? I don't spend a lot of time > actually looking inside archive directories, so from a user perspective it > would seem to not make a difference. Does it affect the efficiency of tla > operations at all (by _far_ the biggest problem with tla is speed)? > -Miles I have no benchmark numbers, but the baz format should be more efficient due to its less number of directory metadata accesses comparing to the tla format, IMHO.
_______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
