"Andy Tai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have no benchmark numbers, but the baz format should be more > efficient due to its less number of directory metadata accesses > comparing to the tla format, IMHO.
Hmmm maybe it's worth trying for a while then. I suppose that if I don't like it, I can always mirror to a tla-format archive and then make the mirror the real archive... -Miles -- `To alcohol! The cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems' --Homer J. Simpson _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
