Hi, Matthieu Moy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There is no really big difference. The main one is that instead of > having c/c--b/c--b--v/, you have only c--b--v/ in the directory > structure, which reduces the probability to hid the max filename > length (this is indeed a keypoint if your archive is hosted on a > windows server, while you probably don't mind if your archive is on a > unix server). Besides, my understanding was that the ultimate goal was to remove the obligation to use a `c--b--v' name space, and that this archive format change was one step in this direction. Is this correct? Thanks, Ludovic. _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
