Matthieu Moy wrote:
Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Besides, my understanding was that the ultimate goal was to remove the
obligation to use a `c--b--v' name space, and that this archive format
change was one step in this direction. Is this correct?
Yes, it was the plan, and it has been abandoned.
You are not in a position to make such assertions. You are talking about
other people's intentions, plans, potential plans, etc.
The truth is closer to: That work is not taking place right now because
there are
not sufficient resources available. The current tla line of
development is being
maintained conservatively -- it is unlikely changes along those lines
will appear
on that line unless a volunteer creates them. Among the many tasks
suspended
for want of resources, it is not completely clear where such changes fit
into the
priority list or technical plan.
-t
_______________________________________________
Gnu-arch-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users
GNU arch home page:
http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
