The V2-only wiki status is unfortunate and I'd add it to the
list of what I think are Canonical's gratuitous
`screw you' behavior visited upon the GNU Arch project.
But, there's an opportunity for good to come of it.
In my opinion, GPL V3 (and let's please not debate it here)
has a lot to offer. I ask/suggest that Arch fans learn about it
and particularly suggest speeches where Eben Moglen
himself talks about it. See:
http://gplv3.fsf.org/av
and more generally
http://gplv3.fsf.org
-t
Andy Tai wrote:
On 6/17/06, Mikhael Goikhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>
>
>As a new owner, will you change the license of new contributions to
> >"GPL v2 or later"? This strong anti-FSF-trust position was the
reason
> >I stopped to contribute to the wiki two years ago.
>
> It it so now for new pages.
OK, although I didn't speak about pages, but about implicit license of
new contributions (to either old or new pages).
Due to "copyleft", licensing conditions of new contributions to old
pages must be the same. So we cannot extend the use of GPL v3 or later
onto these pages.
Regards,
Mikhael.
--
Andy Tai, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Gnu-arch-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users
GNU arch home page:
http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
|
_______________________________________________
Gnu-arch-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users
GNU arch home page:
http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
