Le jeudi 31 octobre 2019, 04:04:37 CET wayne, steve a écrit : > Long time listener, first time caller. > > Ruben, for what it's worth your frothy-at-the-mouth email filled with > tropes of male nerd chauvinism probably isn't a great argument against > "this community is filled with reasons for women not to get involved". That > kind of angry rhetoric is more likely to burn bridges than build them. Just > sayin. > > I don't know this RMS fellow, but everything I have seen put out by him > publicly demonstrates that he lacks a certain kind of social awareness and > inner filter
Yes. That is less political than neuropsychological/personal yet. > really? defending child pornography publicly?? Note “child” is sometimes wrongly used to talk about post-puberian (though minors) humans (and I was one not so long ago, and I can say it is quite enerving to me to use me as political lever), and “pornography” about personal, private (not published) photos, or even fictional drawings. For me putting people in prison for owning *drawings* or having photos of their *same-age* lovers is wrong and ought to be criticized. And that’s a perfectly valid example of why doing so (defending blablabla) SHALL be acceptable. And he did that personally, on his website, not GNU’s. And so few people have the courage doing this (as pedophilia is so widely used as strawman to restrict people’s freedom and sustain first-forms of censorship and repression (like Australia did)) that it is not acceptable either to deprieve society from one temerary individual on the ground of the fact he’s a leader. He’s such because he is easily talkative about important issues, that’s why he’s here, and should continue doing so.